Kinematics and Dynamics Analysis of McPherson Suspension Based on Planar 1/4 Vehicle Model
Abstract
The nonlinear asymmetric problem of McPherson suspension has become a challenging problem in the process of establishing the system model. This paper presents a planar 1/4-vehicle model that not only takes into account the vertical vibration of the sprung mass (chassis), but also includes: ix spring mass (wheel assembly) sliding and rotation; ii longitudinal wheel mass And its moment of inertia; iii tire damping and lateral defl ection. This dynamic kinematic model provides a solution to two important shortcomings of the traditional 1/4 vehicle model: it explains geometric modeling and tire modeling. This paper provides a systematic development of the planar model and a complete mathematical equation. This analysis model can be applied to hardware in the rapid calculation of ring applications. In addition, the model also gives a repeatable Simulink simulation implementation. The model has been compared with the actual Adams / View simulation to analyze the vibration and rebound motion of the wheel, as well as two related motion parameters: the dynamic characteristics of the camber and the pitch change.References
Mantaras D, Luque P, Vera C. Development and validation of a three-dimensional kinematic model for the McPherson steering
and suspension mechanisms. Mech Mach Theory. 2004; 39: 603-619.
Deo H, Suh N. Axiomatic design of automobile suspension and steering systems: proposal for a novel six-bar suspension.
Detroit, MI: SAE World Congress;
Kinematics and Dynamics Analysis of McPherson Suspension Based on Planar 1/4 Vehicle Model
Mántaras DA, Luque P. Virtual test rig to improve the design and optimization process of the vehicle steering and suspension
systems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012; 50: 1563-1584.
Choi SB, Lee HS, Park YP. H-infi nity control performance of a full-vehicle suspension featuring magnetorheological dampers.
Veh Syst Dyn. 2002; 38: 341-360.
Biglarbegian M, Melek W, Golnaraghi F.A novel neuro-fuzzy controller to enhance the performance of vehicle semi-active
suspension systems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008; 46: 691-711.
Abu-Khudhair A, Muresan R, Yang S. Fuzzy control of semi-active automotive suspensions. International Conference on
Mechatronics and Automation; 2009 Aug 9-12; Changchun, China. P. 2118-2122.
Kashani R, Strelow JE. Fuzzy logic active and semi-active control of off -road vehicle suspensions. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010; 32:
-420.
Dong XM, Yu M, Liao CR, Chen WM. Comparative research on semi-active control strategies for magnetorheological
suspension. Nonlinear Dynam. 2010; 59: 433-453.
Sun J, Sun Y. Comparative study on control strategy of active suspension system. Proceedings of the International Conference
on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation. Vol. 1; 2011 Jan 6-7; Shanghai, China. P. 729-732.
Sancibrian R, Garcia P, Viadero F, Fernandez A, De-Juan A. Kinematic design of double-wishbone suspension systems using a
multiobjective optimisation approach. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010; 48: 793-813.
Balike K, Rakheja S, Stiharu I. Development of kineto-dynamic quarter-car model for synthesis of a double wishbone
suspension. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011; 49: 107-128.
Hrovat D. Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal applications applications.
Automatica. 1997; 33: 1781-1817.
Akcay H, Türkay S. RMS performance limitations and constraints for quarter-car active suspensions. 16th
Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation; 2008 June 25-27; Ajaccio, France. P. 425-430.
Dean K. How signifi cant are transfer function relations and invariant points for a quarter car suspension
model? Veh Syst Dyn. 2009; 47: 457-464.
Kim C, Ro P, Kim H. Eff ect of the suspension structure on equivalent suspension parameters. Proceedings of
the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering Vol. 213; 1999 May 1;
London: Sage Publications P. 457-470.
Siau G. Equivalent spring and damper for conceptual suspension modeling [Master's thesis]. Eindhoven:
University of Technology;
Dixon JC. Suspension geometry and computation. Chippenham, UK: First Antony Rowe Ltd .; 2009.
Fallah M, Bhat R, Xie WF. H∞ robust control of semi-active MacPherson suspension system: new applied
design. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010; 48: 339-360.
Stensson A, Asplund C, Karlsson L. The nonlinear behavior of a MacPherson strut wheel suspension. Veh
Syst Dyn. 1994; 23: 85-106.
Andersen ER. Multibody dynamics modeling and system identification for a quarter-car test rig with
McPherson strut suspension [Master's thesis]. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute;
BasariA, Samy, Hamzah N. Nonlinear active suspension system with backstepping control strategy. 2nd
IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications; 2007 May 23-25; Harbin, China. P. 554-558.
Fallah M, Bhat R, Xie W. New model and simulation of MacPherson suspension system for ride control
applications. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009; 47: 195-220.
Kim C, Ro P. Reduced-order modeling and parameter estimation for a quarter-car suspension system.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal ofAutomobile Engineering.Vol. 214;
Aug 1; London: Sage Publications P. 851-864.
Yang J, Abdel-Malek K. Design propagation in kinematics of mechanical systems. Mech Mach Theory.
; 42: 807-824.
Papegay YA, Merlet JP, Daney D. Exact kinematics analysis of car's suspension mechanisms using symbolic
computation and interval analysis. Mech Mach Theory. 2005; 40: 395-413.
Sandu C, Andersen ER, Southward S. Multibody dynamics modation and system identifi cation of a quartercar
test rig with McPherson strut suspension. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011; 49: 153-179.
Zhao JS, Liu X, Feng ZJ, Dai JS. Stiff ness of a rectilinear suspension with automatic length compensation
branches. Mech Mach Theory. 2012; 56: 99-122.
Hurel J, Mandow A, García-Cerezo A. Nonlinear two-dimensional modeling of a McPherson suspension for
kinematics and dynamics simulation. The 12th International Workshop onAdvanced Motion Control; 2012
Mar 25-27; Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina: IEEE. P. 1-6.
Suh C. Synthesis and analysis of suspension mechanisms with use of displacement matrices. SAE Trans.
; 98: 171-182.
Dressler K, Speckert M, Bitsch G. Virtual durability test rigs for automotive engineering. Veh Syst Dyn.
; 47: 387-401.
Reimpell J, Stoll H, Betzler JW. The Automotive Chassis: engineering principles, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK:
Butterworth-Heinemann; 2001.
Copyright (c) 2018 Minghui Ye
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to the journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
