Evaluating the efficiency of renewable energy technologies through thermodynamic analyzes
Abstract
Renewable energy systems hold the key to a sustainable energy future, and at their core lies the pivotal influence of thermodynamics. This article comprehensively explores the fundamental thermodynamic principles that underpin renewable energy technologies, providing a robust foundation for understanding and optimizing their performance. In the context of renewable energy, temperature differentials drive energy flows, pressure and volume changes play crucial roles, and the conservation of energy is paramount. The Second Law of Thermodynamics, represented by entropy, guides the direction of natural processes within these systems. Exergy, a related concept, assesses the quality of energy within a system, facilitating efficiency evaluations. Renewable energy systems often operate on thermodynamic cycles, forming the basis for technologies like solar power plants and geothermal facilities. Heat transfer mechanisms, including conduction, convection, and radiation, are integral to these systems and influence their design and operation. This article summarizes these thermodynamic fundamentals in the context of renewable energy, offering insights into the principles that drive efficiency and sustainability. Understanding these principles is crucial for harnessing renewable energy’s full potential and aligning with global efforts to transition toward cleaner and more sustainable energy sources.
References
Kamran M. Thermodynamics for renewable energy systems. In: Kamran M, Faza MR (editors). Renewable Energy Conversion Systems. Acedemic Press; 2021. pp. 21–51.
Çengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.
Fermi E. Thermodynamics. Dover Publications; 1956. 176p.
Subramanian KRV, George R. Thermodynamic Cycles for Renewable Energy Technologies. IOP Publishing Ltd; 2022.
Wang R, Jiang L, Ma Z, et al. Comparative analysis of small-scale organic Rankine cycle systems for solar energy utilisation. Energies 2019; 12(5): 829. doi: 10.3390/en12050829
Baral S, Kim D, Yun E, Kim KC. Experimental and thermoeconomic analysis of small-scale solar organic Rankine cycle (SORC) system. Entropy 2015; 17(4): 2039–2061. doi: 10.3390/e17042039
Belgasim B, Aldali Y. Review on solar thermal electricity in Libya. Solar Energy and Sustainable Development 2018; 7: 49–61. doi: 10.51646/jsesd.v7iSI.74
Mondejar ME, Andreasen JG, Regidor M, et al. Prospects of the use of nanofluids as working fluids for organic Rankine cycle power systems. Energy Procedia 2017; 129: 160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.098
Saadatfar B, Fakhrai R, Fransson T. Conceptual modeling of nano fluid ORC for solar thermal polygeneration. Energy Procedia 2014; 57: 2696–2705. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.301
Sharma KV, Suleiman A, Hassan HSB, Hegde G. Considerations on the thermophysical properties of nanofluids. In: Korada VS, Hamid NHB (editors). Engineering Applications of Nanotechnology: From Energy to Drug Delivery. Springer; 2017. pp. 33–70.
Sami S. Impact of magnetic field on the enhancement of performance of thermal solar collectors using nanofluids. International Journal of Ambient Energy 2019; 40(8): 875–884. doi: 10.1080/01430750.2018.1437561
Zanatta AR. The Shockley-Queisser limit and the conversion efficiency of silicon-based solar cells. Results in Optics 2022; 9: 100320. doi: 10.1016/j.rio.2022.100320
Shockley W, Queisser HJ. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. Journal of Applied Physics 1961; 32(3): 510–519. doi: 10.1063/1.1736034
Gutowski TG. Manufacturing, renewable energy and thermodynamics. Available online: https://lmp.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/Gutowski.pdf (accessed on 30 October 2023).
Marin A, Dobrovicescu A, Grosu L, Gheoeghian A. Energy and exergy analysis of an organic rankine cycle. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series D 2014; 76(4): 127–136.
Samsuri NB. A Simulation Study on Performance Enhancement of Technoeconomic Efficiency of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Cycle Using Different Working Fluids [Master’s thesis]. Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology; 2017.
Erkan K, Holdmann G, Benoit W, Blackwell D. Understanding the Chena Hot Springs, Alaska, geothermal system using temperature and pressure data from exploration boreholes. Geothermics 2008; 37(6): 565–585. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.09.001
Hu W, Liu Z, Tan J. Thermodynamic analysis of wind energy systems. In: Okedu KE, Tahour A, Aissaoui AG (editors). Wind Solar Hybrid Renewable Energy System. IntechOpen; 2020. pp. 1–19.
Coelho P. The Betz limit and the corresponding thermodynamic limit. Wind Engineering 2023; 47(2): 491–496. doi: 10.1177/0309524X221130109
Şahin AD, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Thermodynamic analysis of wind energy. International Journal of Energy Research 2006; 30(8): 553–566. doi: 10.1002/er.1163
Betz A. In: Randall DG (translator). Introduction to the Theory of Flow Machines (German). Pergamon Press; 1966. 282p.
Froude RE. On the part played in propulsion by difference in pressure. In: Transactions of the Institution of Naval Architects. Royal Institution of Naval Architects; 1889. pp. 1–423.
Golding EW. Generation of Electricity by Wind Power. Routledge; 1987. 368p.
Redha AM, Dincer I, Gadalla M. Thermodynamic performance assessment of wind energy systems: An application. Energy 2011; 36(7): 4002–4010. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.001
Copyright (c) 2023 Yasin Furkan Gorgulu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to the journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
