Finite element modeling of the influence of FRP techniques on the seismic behavior of an arch stone bridge of historical interest
Abstract
In this paper, a masonry bridge is simulated in order to assess both its structural and seismic vulnerability. Therefore, the present study aimed to approximately analyze the real behavior of Mikron Bridge structure. The modeling was conducted by combining the finite element method (FEM) and discrete element method (DEM) using the ABAQUS® software. By comparing the results of numerical and experimental modal analyses, the accuracy of simulation was verified. To simulate the seismic behavior of the Mikron Bridge, the component of Erzincan earthquake occurred in 1992 was used. The results extracted from the seismic analysis show that some parts of the bridge structure are damaged but not destroyed.
References
Altunisik AC., Bayraktar A, Genc AF. A study on seismic behaviour of masonry mosques after restoration. Earthquakes and Structures. 2016; 10(6): 1331–1346.
Mamaghani IHP. Analysis of Masonry Bridges. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2006; 1976(1): 13–19. doi: 10.1177/0361198106197600102
Catalan RO, Aldea LE. New Tendencies on Repair and Strengthening on Masonry Arch Bridges. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Arch Bridges; 2007; pp. 719–724.
Reccia E, Milani G, Cecchi A, et al. Full 3D homogenization approach to investigate the behavior of masonry arch bridges: The Venice trans-lagoon Railway Bridge. Construction and Building Materials. 2014; 66: 567–586. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.096
Cakir F, Burcin SS. Structural Performance of Renovated Masonry Low Bridge in Amasya, Turkey. Earthquakes and Structures. 2016: 8(6): 1387–1406.
Pelà L, Aprile A, Benedetti A. Seismic assessment of masonry arch bridges. Engineering Structures. 2009; 31(8): 1777–1788. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.012
Idris J, Verdel T, Al-Heib M. Numerical modelling and mechanical behaviour analysis of ancient tunnel masonry structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2008; 23(3): 251–263. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.006
Orduña A, Lourenço PB. Three-dimensional limit analysis of rigid blocks assemblages. Part II: Load-path following solution procedure and validation. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2005; 42(18-19): 5161–5180. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.02.011
Daniel, Oliveira V. Experimental and numerical analysis of blocky masonry structures under cyclic loading (Portuguese). Available online: https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/180 (accessed on 3 March 2024).
Jing, L. A Review of Techniques, Advances and Outstanding Issues in Numerical Modelling for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2003; 40(3): 283–353.
Rafiee A, Vinches M, Bohatier C. Application of the NSCD method to analyse the dynamic behaviour of stone arched structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2008; 45(25-26): 6269–6283. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.034
Costa C, Arêde A, Morais M, et al. Detailed FE and DE Modelling of Stone Masonry Arch Bridges for the Assessment of Load-carrying Capacity. Procedia Engineering. 2015; 114: 854–861. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.039
Pulatsu B, Bretas EM, Lourenco PB. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures: Validation and application. Earthquakes and Structures. 2016; 11(4): 563–582.
Lourenço PB, Krakowiak KJ, Fernandes FM, et al. Failure analysis of Monastery of Jerónimos, Lisbon: How to learn from sophisticated numerical models. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2007; 14(2): 280–300. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.02.002
Rovithis EN, Kyriazis DP. Seismic Assessment and Retrofitting Measures of a Historic Stone Masonry Bridge. Earthquake and Structures. 2016; 10(3): 645–667.
Saghafi MH, Safakhah S, Kheyroddin A, et al. In-plane Shear Behavior of FRP Strengthened Masonry Walls. APCBEE Procedia. 2014; 9: 264–268. doi: 10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.047
Ascione L, Feo L, Fraternali F. Load carrying capacity of 2D FRP/strengthened masonry structures. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2005; 36(8): 619–626. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.12.004
Bertolesi E, Milani G, Fedele R. Fast and reliable non-linear heterogeneous FE approach for the analysis of FRP-reinforced masonry arches. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2016; 88: 189–200. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.005
Fossetti M, Minafò G. Comparative experimental analysis on the compressive behaviour of masonry columns strengthened by FRP, BFRCM or steel wires. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2017; 112: 112–124. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.048
Hamed E, Rabinovitch O. Out-of-plane behavior of unreinforced masonry walls strengthened with FRP strips. Composites Science and Technology. 2007; 67(3-4): 489–500. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.021
Bui TL, Si Larbi A, Reboul N, et al. Shear behaviour of masonry walls strengthened by external bonded FRP and TRC. Composite Structures. 2015; 132: 923–932. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.057
De Lorenzis L, Dimitri R, La Tegola A. Reduction of the lateral thrust of masonry arches and vaults with FRP composites. Construction and Building Materials. 2007; 21(7): 1415–1430. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.009
Zhang S, Yang D, Sheng Y, et al. Numerical modelling of FRP-reinforced masonry walls under in-plane seismic loading. Construction and Building Materials. 2017; 134: 649–663. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.091
Witzany J, Cejka T, Zigler R. Problems of Masonry Strengthening with Carbon- and Glass Fibre Fabric. Procedia Engineering. 2011; 14: 2086–2093. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.262
Sevim B, Bayraktar A, Altunişik AC, et al. Assessment of nonlinear seismic performance of a restored historical arch bridge using ambient vibrations. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2010; 63(4): 755–770. doi: 10.1007/s11071-010-9835-y
Copyright (c) 2024 Mehdi Zekavati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
