Optimization of mechanical properties of corn stalk ash and fiber reinforced cement mortar
Abstract
Corn stalk ash and fibers, as agricultural waste materials, offer significant potential for sustainable applications in cementitious composites. This study investigates the effects of corn stalk ash content, fiber content, and water-to-cement ratio on the mechanical properties of cement mortar. A Box-Behnken design (BBD) within the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) framework was employed to evaluate the impact of these factors and their interactions on flexural and compressive strengths. The results indicate that the water-to-cement ratio is the most influential factor, followed by fiber content, while ash content has a relatively minor impact. Notably, the interaction between fiber content and water-to-cement ratio exhibited a strong synergistic effect. The optimized mix design—comprising 10% corn stalk ash, 0.4% fiber content, and a water-to-cement ratio of 0.45–0.5—achieved flexural and compressive strengths of 8.7 MPa and 54 MPa, respectively. Experimental validation demonstrated high model accuracy, with relative errors below 1%. This study underscores the feasibility of utilizing agricultural waste in cement-based materials, contributing to the advancement of sustainable construction practices.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Șerbănoiu AA, Grădinaru CM, Muntean R, et al. Corn Cob Ash versus Sunflower Stalk Ash, Two Sustainable Raw Materials in an Analysis of Their Effects on the Concrete Properties. Materials. 2022; 15(3): 868. doi: 10.3390/ma15030868
2. Șerbănoiu AA, Grădinaru CM, Cimpoesu N, et al. Study of an Ecological Cement-Based Composite with a Sustainable Raw Material, Sunflower Stalk Ash. Materials. 2021; 14(23): 7177. doi: 10.3390/ma14237177
3. Ratna AS, Ghosh A, Mukhopadhyay S. Advances and prospects of corn husk as a sustainable material in composites and other technical applications. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 371: 133563.
4. Memon SA, Khan S, Wahid I, et al. Evaluating the Effect of Calcination and Grinding of Corn Stalk Ash on Pozzolanic Potential for Sustainable Cement-Based Materials. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 2020(1). doi: 10.1155/2020/1619480
5. Khan MFS, Akbar M, Xu Z, et al. A review on the role of pretreatment technologies in the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass of corn stover. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2021; 155: 106276.
6. Gamboa O, Leonardo J, Pérez SPM, et al. Effect of Corn Stover Ash Reinforced with Cabuya Fiber on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2024; 35(2): 103–116.
7. Stel’makh SA, Beskopylny AN, Shcherban EM, et al. Influence of Corn Cob Ash Additive on the Structure and Properties of Cement Concrete. Construction Materials and Products. 2024; 7(3): 2. doi: 10.58224/2618-7183-2024-7-3-2
8. Li Q, Zhao Y, Chen H, et al. Effect of Cornstalk Ash on the Microstructure of Cement-Based Material Under Sulfate Attack. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019; 358(5): 052010. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/358/5/052010
9. Shakouri M, Exstrom C, Ramanathan S, et al. Hydration, Strength, and Durability of Cementitious Materials Incorporating Untreated Corn Cob Ash. Construction and Building Materials. 2020; 243: 118171. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118171
10. de Lima CPF, Cordeiro G. Evaluation of Corn Straw Ash as Supplementary Cementitious Material: Effect of Acid Leaching on Its Pozzolanic Activity. Cement. 2021; 4: 100007. doi: 10.1016/J.CEMENT.2021.100007
11. Dewi SH, Mildawati R, Perdana T. The Benefits of Adding Corn Stalk Ash as a Substitution of Some Cement Against Compressive Strength Concrete. Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology. 2019; 4(3): 208. doi: 10.25299/jgeet.2019.4.3.2966
12. da Costa FBP, Righi DP, Graeff AG, et al. Experimental Study of Some Durability Properties of ECC with a More Environmentally Sustainable Rice Husk Ash and High Tenacity Polypropylene Fibers. Construction and Building Materials. 2019; 213: 505–513. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.092
13. Mohan S, P.C. Effect of Artificial Fibers and Corn Cob Ash on Mechanical Behavior of High Performance Concrete. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2022; 31(4): 3713–3721. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/146991
14. Tan C, Jiang X, Qiang X, et al. Flexural Performance of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Prestressed Spun High-Strength Concrete Pile. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(16): 7170. doi: 10.3390/app14167170
15. Charitha V, Athira VS, Jittin V, et al. Use of Different Agro-Waste Ashes in Concrete for Effective Upcycling of Locally Available Resources. Construction and Building Materials. 2021; 285: 122851. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122851
16. Ahmed A, Hyndman F, Kamau J, et al. Rice Husk Ash as a Cement Replacement in High Strength Sustainable Concrete. Materials Science Forum. 2020; 1007: 90–98. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1007.90
17. Alberti MG, Enfedaque A, Faria DMV, et al. The Potential of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete to Reduce the Environmental Impact of Concrete Construction. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(15): 6629. doi: 10.3390/app14156629
18. Silva G, Kim S, Aguilar R, et al. Natural Fibers as Reinforcement Additives for Geopolymers–A Review of Potential Eco-Friendly Applications to the Construction Industry. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. 2020; 23: e00132. doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00132
19. Hernández-Olivares F, Elizabeth Medina-Alvarado R, Burneo-Valdivieso XE, et al. Short Sugarcane Bagasse Fibers Cementitious Composites for Building Construction. Construction and Building Materials. 2020; 247: 118451. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118451
20. Amin MN, Ahmad W, Khan K, et al. A Comprehensive Review of Types, Properties, Treatment Methods and Application of Plant Fibers in Construction and Building Materials. Materials. 2022; 15(12): 4362. doi: 10.3390/ma15124362
21. Chelladurai SJS, K. M, Ray AP, et al. Optimization of process parameters using Response Surface Methodology: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021; 37(2): 1301–1304.
22. Lamidi S, Olaleye N, Bankole Y, et al. Applications of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in product design, development, and process optimization. In: Response Surface Methodology—Research Advances and Applications. IntechOpen; 2022.
23. Algaifi HA, Muhammad EA, Baharom S, et al. Optimizing polypropylene fiber and carbon nanotubes to reinforce concrete matrix: A Response Surface Methodology. Construction and Building Materials. 2024; 442: 137388.
24. Adamu M, Trabanpruek P, Jongvivatsakul P, et al. Mechanical performance and optimization of high-volume fly ash concrete containing plastic wastes and graphene nanoplatelets using Response Surface Methodology. Construction and Building Materials. 2021; 308: 125085.
25. Zhang Q, Feng X, Chen X, et al. Mix design for recycled aggregate pervious concrete based on Response Surface Methodology. Construction and Building Materials. 2020; 259: 119776.
26. Shi J, Zhao L, Han C, et al. The effects of silanized rubber and nano-SiO2 on microstructure and frost resistance characteristics of concrete using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Construction and Building Materials. 2022; 344: 128226.
27. Ren Z, Liu Y, Yuan L, et al. Optimizing the content of nano-SiO2, nano-TiO2 and nano-CaCO3 in Portland cement paste by Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021; 35: 102073.
28. Waqar A, Bheel N, Shafiq N, et al. Effect of volcanic pumice powder ash on the properties of cement concrete using Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation. 2023; 8(1).
29. Payá J, Escalera A, Borrachero MV, et al. Auto-Combustion of Corn Straw: Production and Characterization of Corn Straw Ash (CSA) for Its Use in Portland Cement Mortars. Materials. 2024; 17(17): 4374.
30. Wang L, Zhu P, Song Z, et al. Experimental Investigation of the Performance of Corn Straw Fiber Cement-Stabilized Macadam. Materials. 2022; 16(1): 294.
31. Niu B, Kim BH. Method for manufacturing corn straw cement-based composite and its physical properties. Materials. 2022; 15(9): 3199.
32. Shang X, Li Z, Chang J, et al. Production, properties and life cycle assessment of artificial lightweight aggregates produced with corn straw ash (CSA) and concrete slurry waste (CSW). Construction and Building Materials. 2024; 411: 134274.
33. Wang H, Qi T, Feng G, et al. Effect of partial substitution of corn straw fly ash for fly ash as supplementary cementitious material on the mechanical properties of cemented coal gangue backfill. Construction and Building Materials. 2021; 280: 122553.
34. Wang H, Feng G, Qi T, et al. Influence of the use of corn straw fibers to connect the interfacial transition zone with the mechanical properties of cemented coal gangue backfill. Construction and Building Materials. 2023; 367: 130334.
35. Jiang D, An P, Cui S, et al. Effect of Straw Fiber Modification Methods on Compatibility between Straw Fibers and Cement‐Based Materials. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2020; 2020(1).
36. Wen L, Yan C, Shi Y, et al. Mechanical and Thermophysical Properties of Concrete with Straw Fiber and Straw Ash. BioResources. 2024; 19(4): 8007–8019.
37. Houankpo TNO, Ma Z, Zhao Z, et al. Performance of Cementitious High-Pressure Mixtures with Wheat and Corn Straw Fiber. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2025; 22: e04175.
38. Sharifi Ghalehnoei M, Javanmardi A, Izadifar M, et al. Finite Element Analysis of Shear Reinforcing of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Grid-Strengthened Engineering Cementitious Composite. Buildings. 2023; 13(4): 1034. doi: 10.3390/buildings13041034
