Mass-energy equivalence and the gravitational redshift: Does energy always have mass?
Abstract
One of the most widespread interpretations of mass-energy equivalence establishes that not only can mass be transformed into energy (e.g., through nuclear fission, fusion, or annihilation), but that every type of energy also has mass (via the mass-energy equivalence formula). Here, we show that this is not always the case. With the help of a few thought experiments, we show that, for instance, the electric potential energy of a charged capacitor should not contribute to the capacitor’s gravitational rest mass (while still contributing to its linear momentum). That result is in agreement with the fact that light (ultimately, an electromagnetic phenomenon) has momentum but not rest mass.
References
Einstein A. Is the inertia of a body dependent on its energy content (German)? Annalen der Physik. 1905; 323(13): 639-641. doi: 10.1002/andp.19053231314
Planck M. On the dynamics of moving systems. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Erster Halbband. 1907; 29: 542-570.
Laue M. On the Dynamics of the Theory of Relativity. Annalen der Physik. 1911; 340(8): 524-542.
Klein F. On the Integral Form of the Conservation Laws and the Theory of the Spatially Closed World. Nachr. Königl. Gesells. Wissensch. Göttingen. 1918; 394-423.
Einstein A. An Elementary Derivation of the Equivalence of Mass and Energy (1946). In: Out of My Later Years: The Scientist, Philosopher, and Man Portrayed Through His Own Words. Philosophical Library; 1950.
Ives Herbert E. 1952 Derivation of the mass-energy relation. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1952; 42(8): 540-543.
Jammer M. Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics. Dover; 1961.
Stachel J, Torretti R. Einstein’s first derivation of mass-energy equivalence. American Journal of Physics. 1982; 50(8): 760-763. doi: 10.1119/1.12764
Rohrlich F. An Elementary Derivation of E = mc2. American Journal of Physics. 1990; 58: 348-350. doi: 10.1119/1.16168
Ohanian H. Did Einstein prove E = mc2? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B. 2009; 40(2): 167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.03.002
Ohanian H. Einstein’s Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius. W.W. Norton; 2009.
Hecht E. How Einstein confirmed E = mc2. American Journal of Physics. 2011; 79(6): 591-600. doi: 10.1119/1.3549223
D’Abramo G. Mass-energy connection without special relativity. European Journal of Physics. 2020; 42(1): 015606. doi: 10.1088/1361-6404/abbca2
The Equivalence of Mass and Energy, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equivME/ (accessed on 22 August 2023).
D’Abramo G. Einstein’s 1905 derivation of the mass-energy equivalence: is it valid? Is energy always equal to mass and vice versa? Physics of Particles and Nuclei. 2023; 54(5): 966-971. doi: 10.1134/S1063779623050076
Misner CW, Thorne KS, Wheeler JA. Gravitational Red Shift Derived from Energy Conservation. In: Gravitation. W. H. Freeman; 1973.
D’Abramo G. Sound escapes any gravity well. Physics Education. 2024; 59(3): 035011. doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/ad2ffa
Singal KA. Contribution of electric self-forces to electromagnetic momentum in a moving system. Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.00431.pdf (accessed on 31 October 2023).
Copyright (c) 2024 Germano D’Abramo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to the journal agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
