Kinematics and Dynamics Analysis of McPherson Suspension Based on Planar 1/4 Vehicle Model
Abstract
The nonlinear asymmetric problem of McPherson suspension has become a challenging problem in the process of establishing the system model. This paper presents a planar 1/4-vehicle model that not only takes into account the vertical vibration of the sprung mass (chassis), but also includes: ix spring mass (wheel assembly) sliding and rotation; ii longitudinal wheel mass And its moment of inertia; iii tire damping and lateral defl ection. This dynamic kinematic model provides a solution to two important shortcomings of the traditional 1/4 vehicle model: it explains geometric modeling and tire modeling. This paper provides a systematic development of the planar model and a complete mathematical equation. This analysis model can be applied to hardware in the rapid calculation of ring applications. In addition, the model also gives a repeatable Simulink simulation implementation. The model has been compared with the actual Adams / View simulation to analyze the vibration and rebound motion of the wheel, as well as two related motion parameters: the dynamic characteristics of the camber and the pitch change.Copyright (c) 2018 Minghui Ye
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
1. Mantaras D, Luque P, Vera C. Development and validation of a three-dimensional kinematic model for the McPherson steering
2. and suspension mechanisms. Mech Mach Theory. 2004; 39: 603-619.
3. Deo H, Suh N. Axiomatic design of automobile suspension and steering systems: proposal for a novel six-bar suspension.
4. Detroit, MI: SAE World Congress;
5. Kinematics and Dynamics Analysis of McPherson Suspension Based on Planar 1/4 Vehicle Model
6.
7. Mántaras DA, Luque P. Virtual test rig to improve the design and optimization process of the vehicle steering and suspension
8. systems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012; 50: 1563-1584.
9. Choi SB, Lee HS, Park YP. H-infi nity control performance of a full-vehicle suspension featuring magnetorheological dampers.
10. Veh Syst Dyn. 2002; 38: 341-360.
11. Biglarbegian M, Melek W, Golnaraghi F.A novel neuro-fuzzy controller to enhance the performance of vehicle semi-active
12. suspension systems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008; 46: 691-711.
13. Abu-Khudhair A, Muresan R, Yang S. Fuzzy control of semi-active automotive suspensions. International Conference on
14. Mechatronics and Automation; 2009 Aug 9-12; Changchun, China. P. 2118-2122.
15. Kashani R, Strelow JE. Fuzzy logic active and semi-active control of off -road vehicle suspensions. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010; 32:
16. -420.
17. Dong XM, Yu M, Liao CR, Chen WM. Comparative research on semi-active control strategies for magnetorheological
18. suspension. Nonlinear Dynam. 2010; 59: 433-453.
19. Sun J, Sun Y. Comparative study on control strategy of active suspension system. Proceedings of the International Conference
20. on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation. Vol. 1; 2011 Jan 6-7; Shanghai, China. P. 729-732.
21. Sancibrian R, Garcia P, Viadero F, Fernandez A, De-Juan A. Kinematic design of double-wishbone suspension systems using a
22. multiobjective optimisation approach. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010; 48: 793-813.
23. Balike K, Rakheja S, Stiharu I. Development of kineto-dynamic quarter-car model for synthesis of a double wishbone
24. suspension. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011; 49: 107-128.
25. Hrovat D. Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal applications applications.
26. Automatica. 1997; 33: 1781-1817.
27. Akcay H, Türkay S. RMS performance limitations and constraints for quarter-car active suspensions. 16th
28. Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation; 2008 June 25-27; Ajaccio, France. P. 425-430.
29. Dean K. How signifi cant are transfer function relations and invariant points for a quarter car suspension
30. model? Veh Syst Dyn. 2009; 47: 457-464.
31. Kim C, Ro P, Kim H. Eff ect of the suspension structure on equivalent suspension parameters. Proceedings of
32. the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering Vol. 213; 1999 May 1;
33. London: Sage Publications P. 457-470.
34. Siau G. Equivalent spring and damper for conceptual suspension modeling [Master's thesis]. Eindhoven:
35. University of Technology;
36. Dixon JC. Suspension geometry and computation. Chippenham, UK: First Antony Rowe Ltd .; 2009.
37. Fallah M, Bhat R, Xie WF. H∞ robust control of semi-active MacPherson suspension system: new applied
38. design. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010; 48: 339-360.
39. Stensson A, Asplund C, Karlsson L. The nonlinear behavior of a MacPherson strut wheel suspension. Veh
40. Syst Dyn. 1994; 23: 85-106.
41. Andersen ER. Multibody dynamics modeling and system identification for a quarter-car test rig with
42. McPherson strut suspension [Master's thesis]. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute;
43. BasariA, Samy, Hamzah N. Nonlinear active suspension system with backstepping control strategy. 2nd
44. IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications; 2007 May 23-25; Harbin, China. P. 554-558.
45. Fallah M, Bhat R, Xie W. New model and simulation of MacPherson suspension system for ride control
46. applications. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009; 47: 195-220.
47. Kim C, Ro P. Reduced-order modeling and parameter estimation for a quarter-car suspension system.
48. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal ofAutomobile Engineering.Vol. 214;
49. Aug 1; London: Sage Publications P. 851-864.
50. Yang J, Abdel-Malek K. Design propagation in kinematics of mechanical systems. Mech Mach Theory.
51. ; 42: 807-824.
52. Papegay YA, Merlet JP, Daney D. Exact kinematics analysis of car's suspension mechanisms using symbolic
53. computation and interval analysis. Mech Mach Theory. 2005; 40: 395-413.
54. Sandu C, Andersen ER, Southward S. Multibody dynamics modation and system identifi cation of a quartercar
55. test rig with McPherson strut suspension. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011; 49: 153-179.
56. Zhao JS, Liu X, Feng ZJ, Dai JS. Stiff ness of a rectilinear suspension with automatic length compensation
57. branches. Mech Mach Theory. 2012; 56: 99-122.
58. Hurel J, Mandow A, García-Cerezo A. Nonlinear two-dimensional modeling of a McPherson suspension for
59. kinematics and dynamics simulation. The 12th International Workshop onAdvanced Motion Control; 2012
60. Mar 25-27; Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina: IEEE. P. 1-6.
61. Suh C. Synthesis and analysis of suspension mechanisms with use of displacement matrices. SAE Trans.
62. ; 98: 171-182.
63. Dressler K, Speckert M, Bitsch G. Virtual durability test rigs for automotive engineering. Veh Syst Dyn.
64. ; 47: 387-401.
65. Reimpell J, Stoll H, Betzler JW. The Automotive Chassis: engineering principles, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK:
66. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2001.
