Social Media and Marriage Equality in Australia: The Media Roles in the Public Sphere and the Agenda-Setting

Yuhanyin Ma

doi:10.18282/inm.v5i1.335

Yuhanyin Ma Monash University, Victoria 3145, Australia

Article ID: 335

1728 Views

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/inm.v5i1.335

Keywords: Agenda-setting, Australia, Marriage Equality, Legalization, Public Sphere, Same-sex Marriage, Social Media

Abstract

Marriage equality or the equal status of same-sex marriage has undergone a rather tough road in Australia, involving diverging opinions in parties at the state and federal levels and constitutional amendments. It appears that people in power set the agenda on the legalization of same-sex marriage. However, it cannot be denied that social media played an almost decisive role in this process because it enabled the gathering of massive public opinion to pressure the government to make changes. To be specific, social media or social networking sites offered platforms for people concerned to share reports about the progress of foreign countries in legalizing same-sex marriage, to express their opinions and to launch campaigns in support of their beliefs. This essay explores the role that social media played in the legalization of marriage equality movement in Australia from the perspectives of the public sphere theory and the agenda-setting theory.

References

McCombs M. A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies. 2005; 6(4): 543–557.

Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 1984.

Wolfe M, Jones BD, Baumgartner FR. A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication. 2013; 30(2): 175–192.

Baumgartner FR, Jones BD. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1993.

Dunaway J, Branton R, Abrajano M. Agenda setting, public opinion, and the issue of immigration reform. Social Science Quarterly. 2010; 91(2): 359–378.

Dragu T, Fan X. An agenda-setting theory of electoral competition. The Journal of Politics. 2016; 78(4): 1170–1183.

Ahmed LA, Ryan JM. Same-sex marriage. Journal of GLBT Family Studies. 2016; 73(1): 23–29.

Graham KT. Same-sex couples: Their rights as parents, and their children’s rights as children. Santa Clara Law Review. 2008; 48(4).

Yang X, Chen B, Maity M, et al. Social politics: Agenda setting and political communication on social media. Social Informatics. 2016; 4(3): 330–344.

Bernstein M. Same-sex marriage and the assimilationist dilemma: A research agenda on marriage equality and the future of LGBTQ activism, politics, communities, and identities. Journal of Homosexuality. 2018; 2(1): 6–10.

Mitchell M. Book Review: Discourse, Identity, and Social Change in the Marriage Equality Debates. By Karen Tracey. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.

Kemmis S. Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research. 2006; 14(4): 459-476.

Fraser N. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text. 1990; 8(3): 17–21.

Dahlgren P. The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication. 2005; 22(2): 147–162.

Chambers S. Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science. 2003; 18(6): 307–326.

Loader B, Mercea D. Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society. 2011; 14(6): 757–769.

Hauser GA. Features of the public sphere. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 1987; 4(4): 437–441.

Fung A. Survey article: Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2003; 11(3): 338–367.

Dalton RJ. Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 2008; 56(1): 76–98.

Castells M. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2008; 616(1): 78–93.

Dahlberg L. The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society. 2001; 4(4): 615–633.

Papacharissi Z. The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society. 2002; 4(1): 9–27.

Charles GE, Fuentesrohwer LE. Habermas, the public sphere, and the creation of a racial counterpublic. Michigan Journal of Race & Law. 2015; 21(1): 1–21.

Aviram H. Make love, now law: perceptions of the marriage equality struggle among polyamorous activists. Journal of Bisexuality. 2008; 7(3–4): 261–286.

O’Connor C. Appeals to nature in marriage equality debates: A content analysis of newspaper and social media discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2017; 56(3): 493–514.

Rostosky SS, Riggle EDB. Marriage equality for same-sex couples: Counseling psychologists as social change agents. Counseling Psychologist. 2011; 39(7): 956–972.

Anderson J, Georgantis C, Kapelles T. Predicting support for marriage equality in Australia. Australian Journal of Psychology. 2017; 69(2).

Rainey SS. In sickness and in health: Cripping and queering marriage equality. Hypatia. 2017; 32(1): 230–246.

Ashforth BE, Mael FA. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review. 1989; 14(1): 20–39.

Eyssel F, Loughnan S. It doesn’t matter if you’re black or white? Social Robotics. 2013; 3(7): 11–16.

Meek J. LGBT and the theory of dissonant identity priming. Political Quarterly. 2018; 89(1): 150–152.

Halkitis PN. Obama, marriage equality, and the health of gay Men. American Journal of Public Health. 2012; 102(9): 1628–1629.

Flores AR, Brian FH, Melissa RM. Listen, we need to talk: How to change attitudes about LGBT rights. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2018; 82(1): 200–202.

Schacter JS. Courts and the politics of backlash: marriage equality litigation, then and now. Social Science Electronic Publishing. 2010; 82(6): 1153–1223.

Nejaime D. Marriage equality and the new parenthood. Harvard Law Review. 2016; 129: 1185–1266.

Armenia A, Troia B. Evolving opinions: Evidence on marriage equality attitudes from panel data. Social Science Quarterly. 2017; 98(1): 185–195.

Riggle EDB, Drabble L, Veldhuis CB, et al. The impact of marriage equality on sexual minority women’s relationships with their families of origin. Journal of Homosexuality. 2017; 65(9).