The timeliness of constructionist theory in the process of journalistic content production in the digital age
Abstract
This research explores the relevance of constructionist theory in the production of journalistic content in the digital age. Constructionist theory posits that reality is socially constructed and shaped by the discursive practices of the media, gaining significance within a media landscape profoundly transformed by digitization, the proliferation of social networks, and the use of algorithms. The investigation employs a qualitative methodology, utilizing a systematic literature review of publications from 2013 to 2023, aiming to map the principal theoretical and empirical approaches that discuss the impact of new technologies and communicative practices on contemporary journalism. The findings indicate that the digital era has intensified the constructionist nature of news production, given the multiplicity of voices and agents involved in the mediation process, including an actively participating public in the creation and dissemination of content. It was further observed that digital platforms, by personalizing news consumption through algorithms, create fragmented realities and filter bubbles, challenging the notion of a shared news reality. Moreover, the emergence of misinformation and “fake news” underscores the importance of a constructionist approach to understanding how news narratives are continuously negotiated and reconstructed. It is concluded that constructionist theory remains a valid analytical framework for understanding the dynamics of journalistic production in the digital age, particularly in a context where the boundaries between news producers and consumers have become increasingly fluid.
References
CARLSON, M. Fake news as an informational moral panic: the symbolic deviancy of social media during the 2016 US presidential election. Information, Communication & Society, v. 23, n. 3, p. 374–388, 2020.
JUST, N.; LATZER, M. Governance by algorithms: reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet. Media, culture & society, v. 39, n. 2, p. 238–258, 2017.
PAVLIK, J. V. Innovation and the future of journalism. Digital journalism, v. 1, n. 2, p. 181–193, 2013.
BERGER, P.; LUCKMANN, T. The social construction of reality. Em: Social theory re-wired. [s.l.] Routledge, 2016. p. 110–122.
NIELSEN, R. K.; GANTER, S. A. The power of platforms: Shaping media and society. [s.l.] Oxford University Press, 2022.
SCHUDSON, M. The sociology of news WW Northon & Company. 2003.
ROSENSTIEL, T. The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. [s.l.] Three Rivers Press, 2014.
HERMIDA, A. Tell everyone: Why we share and why it matters. [s.l.] Anchor Canada, 2016.
ZELIZER, B. Why journalism is about more than digital technology. Digital journalism, v. 7, n. 3, p. 343–350, 2019.
BUCHER, T. If... then: Algorithmic power and politics. [s.l.] Oxford University Press, 2018.
TANDOC JR, E. C.; LIM, Z. W.; LING, R. Defining “fake news” A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital journalism, v. 6, n. 2, p. 137–153, 2018.
GRAVES, L.; CHERUBINI, F. The rise of fact-checking sites in Europe. Digital News Project Report, 2016.
TUCHMAN, G. Making news: A study in the construction of reality. Free Pres, 1978.
GALTUNG, J.; RUGE, M. H. The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of peace research, v. 2, n. 1, p. 64–90, 1965.
MCCHESNEY, R. “Rich Media Poor Democracy. The Political Communication Reader, p. 2, 2023.
VOSOUGHI, S.; ROY, D.; ARAL, S. The spread of true and false news online. science, v. 359, n. 6380, p. 1146–1151, 2018.
LEWANDOWSKY, S.; ECKER, U. K. H.; COOK, J. Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, v. 6, n. 4, p. 353–369, 2017.
GRAVES, E. K. Covering Extended Reality Technologies in the Media. [s.l.] Taylor & Francis, 2023.
PENNYCOOK, G.; RAND, D. G. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 116, n. 7, p. 2521–2526, 2019.
VAN DIJCK, J.; POELL, T.; DE WAAL, M. The platform society: Public values in a connective world. [s.l.] Oxford university press, 2018.
TUFEKCI, Z. Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colo. Tech. LJ, v. 13, p. 203, 2015.
SUNSTEIN, C. # Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. [s.l.] Princeton university press, 2018.
PARISER, E. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. [s.l.] penguin UK, 2011.
BENNETT, W. L.; SEGERBERG, A. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. [s.l.] Cambridge University Press, 2013.
MCCHESNEY, R. W. Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. [s.l.] New Press, The, 2016.
SINGER, J. B. Sem medo do futuro: ética do jornalismo, inovação e um apelo à flexibilidade. Comunicação e Sociedade, v. 25, p. 49–66, 2014.
SCHEUFELE, D. A.; KRAUSE, N. M. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 116, n. 16, p. 7662–7669, 2019.
STROUD, N. J. Attention as a valuable resource. Political Communication, v. 34, n. 3, p. 479–489, 2017.
LAZER, D. M. J. et al. The science of fake news. Science, v. 359, n. 6380, p. 1094–1096, 2018.
BRUNS, A. Gatewatching and news curation: Journalism, social media, and the public sphere (Digital Formations, Volume 113). [s.l.] Peter Lang Publishing, 2018.
GAGLIARDONE, I. et al. Countering online hate speech. [s.l.] Unesco Publishing, 2015.
ZHAO, B.; BILEN, H. Dataset condensation with differentiable siamese augmentation. International Conference on Machine Learning. Anais...PMLR, 2021.
Copyright (c) 2024 Cantífula de Castro, Bruno F. Gonçalves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
