Mapping fake news and misinformation in media: A two-decade bibliometric review of emerging trends
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of fake news and misinformation poses significant challenges to media trust, public decision-making, and societal cohesion in the digital age. This study employs a bibliometric analysis to systematically map the scholarly landscape surrounding fake news and misinformation across media platforms, focusing on social media’s pivotal role in shaping public perception and trust. Utilizing data from the Scopus database, the study analyzes 560 documents published between 2005 and 2025, uncovering trends in annual scientific production, leading sources, author contributions, and geographical distribution. Key bibliometric indicators, including keyword co-occurrence networks and collaboration patterns, are visualized using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer to highlight emerging themes and interdisciplinary intersections. Findings reveal a sharp increase in research output after 2016, driven by global events such as the U.S. presidential election and the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring misinformation’s societal impact. Geographical analysis highlights dominant contributions from the United States and Spain, alongside emerging research hubs like Brazil. The analysis further identifies key institutions, such as the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and the University of Vienna, leading the global effort to address misinformation. Despite notable advancements, critical gaps remain in exploring misinformation within non-Western contexts and non-English academic literature. This study underscores the need for inclusive, interdisciplinary research to address misinformation’s global implications, ranging from public health crises to electoral integrity. Mapping the academic discourse offers actionable insights into the dynamics of misinformation and supports strategies to foster a more informed and resilient society. The findings hold profound relevance for policymakers, researchers, and media professionals, emphasizing the urgency of combating misinformation to safeguard democratic values and societal trust in the digital era.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Zhang X, Ghorbani AA. An overview of online fake news: Characterization, detection, and discussion. Information Processing & Management. 2020; 57(2): 102025. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.004
2. Balmas M. When Fake News Becomes Real. Communication Research. 2012; 41(3): 430-454. doi: 10.1177/0093650212453600
3. Gelfert A. Fake News: A Definition. Informal Logic. 2018; 38(1): 84-117. doi: 10.22329/il.v38i1.5068
4. Van Duyn E, Collier J. Priming and Fake News: The Effects of Elite Discourse on Evaluations of News Media. Mass Communication and Society. 2018; 22(1): 29-48. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807
5. Haciyakupoglu G, Yang Hui J, Suguna VS, et al. Front Matter. In: Countering Fake News: A Survey of Recent Global Initiatives. RSIS Publications; 2018.
6. Katsirea I. “Fake news”: reconsidering the value of untruthful expression in the face of regulatory uncertainty. Journal of Media Law. 2018; 10(2): 159-188. doi: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1573569
7. Tambini D. Fake news: Public policy responses. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science. Available online: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/73015 (accessed on 2 December 2024).
8. Lee J, Ott T, Deavours D. Combating Misinformation in Risk. Democracy in the Disinformation Age; 2021.
9. Allcott H, Gentzkow M. Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2017.
10. Andersson S, Wikström N. Why and how are social media used in a B2B context, and which stakeholders are involved? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2017; 32(8): 1098-1108. doi: 10.1108/jbim-07-2016-0148
11. Lashgari M, Sutton-Brady C, Solberg Søilen K, et al. Adoption strategies of social media in B2B firms: a multiple case study approach. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2018; 33(5): 730-743. doi: 10.1108/jbim-10-2016-0242
12. Craft S, Ashley S, Maksl A. News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public. 2017; 2(4): 388-401. doi: 10.1177/2057047317725539
13. Goyanes M, Ardèvol-Abreu A, Gil de Zúñiga H. Antecedents of News Avoidance: Competing Effects of Political Interest, News Overload, Trust in News Media, and “News Finds Me” Perception. Digital Journalism. 2021; 11(1): 1-18. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2021.1990097
14. Rosu MM, Cosmoiu AM, Ianole-Calin R, et al. Stories worth sharing – why do people spread news online? Online Information Review. 2023; 48(3): 581-600. doi: 10.1108/oir-12-2022-0693
15. Vraga EK, Bode L, Tully M. Creating News Literacy Messages to Enhance Expert Corrections of Misinformation on Twitter. Communication Research. 2020; 49(2): 245-267. doi: 10.1177/0093650219898094
16. Hinsley A, Holton A. Fake news cues: examining the impact of content, source, and typology of news cues on People’s confidence in identifying Mis-and disinformation. International Journal of Communication. 2021; 15.