Origin and Development of Modern British Political Parties
Abstract
Britain is the origin of modern political parties and party systems. Since the beginning of the bourgeois revolution of Britain in 1640, there was a long struggle between royalty and anti-royalty and the realignment and regrouping of various political forces strengthened the power of the bourgeoisie in parliament. Those who represented the interests of the bourgeoisie and the bourgeois new aristocracy were called “the Whig Party”, while those who represented the interests of the old aristocracy were called “the Tories” (Conservative Party; Tory was an insulting word of Irishmen meaning “outlaw”). Although both parties were still limited to parliamentary activities and did not have national public organizations and systems, they were the earliest origins of the British political parties.
In the 1760s, the Industrial Revolution broke out in Britain. During this period, capitalism developed rapidly with continuous changes within the bourgeoisie. Under such circumstances, the Tories became the political representative of the landowners and then changed to the Conservative Party in 1833. In 1839, representing the interests of the industrial bourgeoisie, the Whig Party changed their name to the Liberal Party, striving for votes, and gaining a majority in parliament. It broke through the narrow scopes of parliament to compete for the growth of its organization throughout the country, and established its own electoral associations and other institutions. By the middle of the 19th century, both parties had established national party organizations and constructed their own organizational systems, resulting in the emergence of two major political parties directly related to modern Britain.
Copyright (c) 2021 Xiao Zhou

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any open access article in a journal published by PiscoMed Publishing is retained by the author(s).
Authors grant PiscoMed Publishing a license to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the article.
The current adopted license, the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), formalizes these and other terms and conditions of publishing articles. The license (CC BY 4.0) means:
Share: Everyone can copy and redistribute the open-access content in the journal.
Adapt: Materials in the articles can be remixed, reused, and reanalyzed for any purpose.
Attribution: You must cite the source with the correct license if some changes to the materials are made, but that does not mean that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Authors should ensure that the content of the article is not involved in a copyright dispute before submitting it. For previously published articles, authors should obtain permission from the copyright holder if the material is under a more restrictive license.
References
Liu H. Development of party politics and change of party systems: Taking Britain as an example (in Chinese). Probe 2017; (4): 57–64.
Ding Y. The study of functions of political parties under the rule of law state [PhD thesis]. Shanghai: East China University of Political Science and Law; 2017.
Lin J. Importance to deepen the study of the dominant ideology of contemporary political parties—A review on Relationship between the Development of Labor Party and the Dominant Ideology in Britain (in Chinese). Shandong Social Sciences 2014; (1): 193.
Han J. Research on interactions between network media and modern political parties—Taking European social democratic party as an example [Master’s thesis]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University; 2013.
Liu C. The establishment of British modern party politics. History Teaching 2011; (8): 35–40.
Cui S. The policy vane: A research on the election manifestos of the British political parties (1900-2005) [PhD thesis]. Beijing: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; 2010.